Back to blog

Devin Desktop vs Cursor: Which Should You Use in 2026?

Devin Desktop (the former Windsurf) vs Cursor: pricing, models, agent workflows and code review compared. See which one fits how you work — full 2026 verdict.

25 sept 2026

The old search was "Windsurf vs Cursor." It can't be run anymore: on June 2, 2026, Cognition pushed an over-the-air update that turned Windsurf into Devin Desktop, and on July 1, 2026 the Cascade agent reached end-of-life, replaced by Devin Local. (The full timeline is in what happened to Windsurf; here we treat it as settled history.)

Cursor spent the same quarter growing outward too — cloud agents, Bugbot, and on September 23, 2026 two new bots, Rollouts and Security Review, that follow a change past the merge into production. The products have converged from opposite directions: Cursor began as an interactive editor and grew autonomous pieces; Devin began as a fully autonomous cloud engineer and grew an interactive IDE — which is literally what Devin Desktop is. Choosing is no longer "editor vs robot." It is about where work lives (your session, or a delegated queue), which model menu you want, and which meter you'd rather be on.

Everything below is sourced to devin.ai/pricing, the Devin Desktop FAQ, cursor.com/pricing and Cursor's docs — where a page doesn't print a number, we say so instead of guessing.

Quick answer

  • Different shapes. Cursor is an interactive AI editor — Tab, inline edits, an in-IDE agent. Devin is an autonomous agent family; Devin Desktop is the editor-shaped command center that manages it.
  • Same entry price, different meters. Both start paid at $20/month, but Devin sells quotas refreshing daily and weekly (overage at API pricing), while Cursor sells included usage topped by usage-based billing in arrears.
  • Models: menu vs house brand. Cursor has the wider menu and accepts your own API keys — so you can wire in DeepSeek. Devin curates a smaller list and gates frontier models plus its own SWE-2 behind Pro.
  • Teams and review: Cursor's Rollouts and Security Reviewer bots (Sept 23, Teams/Enterprise) are the fresher code-review story; Devin's strength is parallel delegated work reviewed in one board.
  • Verdict: daily hands-on coding → Cursor; delegated parallel work → Devin. Plenty of teams run both.

What each product actually is

Devin Desktop (plus Local and Cloud). Cognition's FAQ is blunt: "Devin Desktop is the new name for Windsurf. It's the same IDE, same editor, and has the same features, but unified under the Devin brand." Three names, not interchangeable:

  • Devin Desktop — the IDE, formerly Windsurf. Primary view: the Agent Command Center, a Kanban board of agent runs grouped into Spaces. The classic editor remains; local-only use needs no cloud.
  • Devin Local — the in-editor agent that replaced Cascade: Rust rewrite, subagents, sandboxed commands, up to 30% better token efficiency, same architecture as Devin CLI.
  • Devin Cloud — the original autonomous Devin: a separate SKU that works asynchronously and opens PRs. "Slow" on Free, included from Pro up.

Our Devin Desktop tutorial walks the setup step by step.

Cursor. An AI-first VS Code fork built around Tab completion, inline edit/ask, and Agent mode — plus a model picker spanning Cursor's own Composer and Grok models and Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Z.ai, Moonshot and Meta; cloud agents; Bugbot for PR review; MCP, skills and hooks; and, since September 23, 2026, the Rollouts and Security Review bots on Teams and Enterprise.

Devin Desktop vs Cursor, item by item

DimensionDevin Desktop (Cognition)Cursor
What it isFormer Windsurf IDE, rebuilt as an agent command centerAI-first code editor (VS Code fork)
Agent familyDevin Local (in-IDE), Devin Cloud (async SKU), CLI, Devin ReviewAgent, cloud agents, Bugbot, Rollouts/Security Review bots
Primary unitA delegated task on the Command Center boardYour editing session
AutonomyTasks run to completion in sandboxes; you review diffsYou drive; agent acts per prompt, approvals configurable
ParallelismUp to 10 concurrent sessions on Free/Pro; unlimited on MaxMultiple sessions; cloud agents run off your machine
ModelsFree: limited. Pro: OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, SpaceXAI + open source + SWE-2Composer/Grok + Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Z.ai, Moonshot, Meta; BYOK
Your API keyNo — curated menuYes (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure, Bedrock; chat models only)
Entry pricingFree / Pro $20/mo / Max $200/mo / Teams $80/mo + $40 per seat / Enterprise customHobby free / Individual $20/mo / Teams $40 per user/mo / Enterprise custom
Usage meterQuotas refresh daily and weekly; overage at API pricingIncluded usage; on-demand billed in arrears
Code reviewReview queue in Devin Desktop; Devin ReviewBugbot; Security Reviewer per PR; Rollouts watch production (Teams+, Sep 23)
Best fitParallel delegated work you don't babysitInteractive daily coding, widest model choice

Pricing: same entry price, different meters

Devin. Free ($0): light quota, limited models, unlimited Tab and inline edits, up to 10 concurrent sessions, Devin Cloud at "Slow." Pro, $20/month: increased quotas, full models, Devin Cloud agents, free SWE-2 Free in Devin Desktop and CLI through October 10, 2026, overage at API pricing. Max, $200/month: much higher quotas, unlimited concurrency. Teams, $80/month plus $40 per full dev seat — per the FAQ, the seat "unlock[s] Devin Desktop and $40/month of usage that works across all Devin products." Enterprise is custom (SSO, VPC). Quotas "refresh automatically on a daily and weekly basis."

Cursor. Hobby is free: limited Agent requests, Composer access. Individual, $20/month, comes in Pro, Pro+ and Ultra tiers — the pricing page shows the $20 entry and doesn't print separate figures for Pro+ and Ultra, so verify there before budgeting. It adds extended agent limits, frontier models, MCP/skills/hooks and cloud agents; Bugbot is usage-based. Teams, $40 per user/month: centralized billing, SSO, privacy mode. Beyond included usage, on-demand usage is "billed in arrears."

Two honesty notes: neither vendor prints per-plan quota numbers, so any exact "tasks per month" figure is an estimate. And legacy Windsurf plans carried over unchanged — "pricing is unchanged" — which can make Devin Desktop cheaper for ex-Windsurf users than the sticker table suggests.

Models: the menu vs the house brand

Cursor's pitch is choice. Custom API keys work for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure OpenAI and AWS Bedrock providers, with rules: chat models only ("Tab completion continues using Cursor's built-in models"), Individual-plan requests billed by your provider and drawing nothing from your Cursor usage, while Teams/Enterprise third-party requests carry a $0.25 per million token Cursor Token Rate. Zero Data Retention doesn't apply to BYOK traffic. Because the OpenAI slot accepts compatible endpoints, DeepSeek can be wired in — our DeepSeek-in-Cursor guide has the settings.

Devin's pitch is curation. Pro unlocks "frontier models from OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and SpaceXAI, plus leading open source models" (the pricing page's wording), and Cognition's own models increasingly lead: SWE-2 is the latest in-house model, free in Desktop and CLI through October 10, 2026. There is no bring-your-own-key option — you buy the plan, Cognition routes the model, the quota is the only dial. Simpler to administer; worse if your favorite model isn't on the menu.

Where the work actually happens

Cursor is built around your session: you type, Tab suggests, the agent is one prompt away, and every diff lands in the editor you already review by hand. Devin Desktop is built around the queue: the Agent Command Center puts the Kanban board first and the editor second — Cognition's line is "a full IDE with an agent manager built in — not the other way around." You file tasks; agents work them in sandboxes; you review in batches. Cascade's retirement moved interactive users onto Devin Local, so the interactive loop still works — it's just no longer the center of gravity.

In practice: a long arc of small edits you want done now favors Cursor's tighter loop. Well-specified chunks — migrations, test sweeps, small features across repos — that you'd rather queue and review at 4pm favor Devin's. If you like the queue idea but not Cognition's ecosystem, we compared the manager-style workflow in Roo Code alternatives; the Cascade-era interactive flow survives in our Windsurf tutorial, which still maps onto Devin Local's panels.

Code review and the security story

The time-stamped signal: on September 23, 2026, Cursor shipped Security Review — every PR scanned in full-codebase context for injection, broken auth, committed secrets and vulnerable dependencies, each with severity and a one-click fix — and Rollouts, which "watches a change from PR to production, flags regressions, and acts to restore a healthy state." Both are Teams/Enterprise only; Individual users get Bugbot on usage-based billing. Devin's answer is structural: delegated tasks land PRs and review items in Spaces, with Devin Review for post-run assessment. For org-level security review, Cursor is the more concrete buy today; for reviewing many tasks at all, Devin's batch surface is the point.

Choose Devin Desktop if — and if not

Choose it when the work is queue-shaped: parallel runs (ten concurrent even on Free/Pro), sandboxed execution, PRs out the other end, one board to review them. Ex-Windsurf users should price it seriously — carried-over plans make it the cheapest way to keep a familiar editor. Skip it if model choice is non-negotiable: no BYOK, frontier models behind Pro. Choose Cursor for the interactive loop: the fastest Tab in the category, the widest menu, BYOK spend control, org-level review bots. Skip it if you want to hand off whole tasks and walk away — its cloud agents exist, but the product assumes you at the keyboard, and heavy agent use on usage-based billing can outrun the flat $20.

  • Solo dev, daily coding → Cursor Individual; add a custom-key model for bulk work.
  • Team lead with a backlog of specified tasks → Devin Teams seats, reviewed in Spaces.
  • Ex-Windsurf subscriber → Devin Desktop first; evaluate Cursor only if Devin Local disappoints.
  • Tight budget, no subscription → neither: a BYOK editor on DeepSeek's API, below.
  • Security-review-driven org → Cursor Teams/Enterprise for the September bots, today.

The cheaper wildcard: bring your own model

Cursor takes custom keys directly — the DeepSeek-in-Cursor guide sets an OpenAI-compatible base URL and key, and bulk work is then billed per token instead of drawn from quotas. Devin has no key slot — the equivalent move happens at the editor layer: our DeepSeek harness setup guide wires DeepSeek into BYOK editors and terminal agents at pay-per-token prices. Know the trade: BYOK means you administer the key and inherit whatever your provider's model menu does next — 2026 has retired model names underneath people more than once.

FAQ

What is the difference between Devin Desktop and Cursor? Devin Desktop is Cognition's IDE — the product formerly known as Windsurf — built as a command center for autonomous agents: Devin Local in the editor, Devin Cloud as an async SKU, tasks queued and batch-reviewed. Cursor is an interactive AI editor: Tab, inline edits, an in-IDE agent, plus cloud agents and review bots. One manages a queue of delegated work; the other accelerates work you do at the keyboard.

Is Devin Desktop free? Yes — a Free plan at $0: light agent quota, limited models, unlimited Tab and inline edits, up to 10 concurrent sessions, Devin Cloud at "Slow." Pro at $20/month unlocks full models and faster cloud agents. Former Windsurf users keep their existing plans unchanged; the rename didn't touch pricing.

Can Devin replace Cursor? For delegated work, arguably yes — queue a task, get a PR. For interactive coding, not cleanly: Devin Local is a capable in-editor assistant, but Devin's center of gravity is the task queue, not your typing loop. They coexist fine: draft interactively in one, delegate batch work to the other.

How does Devin vs Claude Code compare — is that a different question? Different axis. Claude Code is a terminal-first interactive agent working in your local checkout, in a conversation. Devin is autonomous and asynchronous at heart — cloud environments, tasks that run to completion, PRs as the handoff. Cursor overlaps Claude Code more than it overlaps Devin; Devin vs Cursor is queue vs session, not editor vs terminal.

Which is cheaper in 2026, Devin or Cursor? At entry, identical: $20/month each. Then they diverge — Devin Max at $200/month vs Cursor's unlisted Pro+ and Ultra tiers; Devin Teams at $80/month plus $40 per seat vs Cursor's $40 per user. Overage differs too — Devin bills extra usage at API pricing, Cursor in arrears — and neither publishes quota numbers. Ex-Windsurf legacy pricing can beat both.

Can I use DeepSeek or my own API key in either tool? In Cursor, yes: custom keys work for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure and Bedrock on chat models (Tab always uses Cursor's own models), and the OpenAI-compatible slot accepts DeepSeek — setup in our DeepSeek-in-Cursor guide. In Devin, no: no BYOK option. If owning the model layer is the priority, a BYOK editor per our DeepSeek harness guide beats both.

I was a Windsurf user — should I switch to Cursor now? Only if the rename broke something you cared about. Migration was an over-the-air update: same IDE, settings and plans, Cascade's workflow preserved by Devin Local (our Windsurf tutorial still maps one-to-one). The honest trigger is workflow: if you never used Cascade's agent panel and just want fast autocomplete plus an inline assistant, Cursor does that excellently.

Related reading